|
9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
Tuesday, June 6, 2006
|
Case No. 1 - 77576-1
|
COUNSEL
|
In the Matter of the Detention of Daniel Audett.
State of Washington
v.
Daniel Audett
|
Brooke Burbank/David Hackett
Nancy Collins
|
SYNOPSIS: Did the trial court have authority to order a second mental exam for respondent in sexually violent predator proceedings? If not, was it proper for the judge to allow the psychologist to testify at trial?
|
Case No. 2 - 77532-0
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington
v.
Darnell Keeno Crawford
|
Kathleen Proctor
Leslie Stomsvik
|
SYNOPSIS: Does the State have to give a defendant notice before trial that he faces his third strike? Does an attorney provide ineffective assistance of counsel by not finding out and informing the defendant before trial that he faces his third strike?
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 - 200,316-8 (WSBA 12294)
|
COUNSEL
|
In re:
Stephen Blanchard, Attorney at Law.
|
Kurt Bulmer
Natalea Skvir (WSBA)
|
SYNOPSIS: What is the proper remedy when the Board fails to state its reasons for amending the Hearing Officer’s recommendation? What is the proper sanction for Mr. Blanchard’s violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct?
|
Case No. 4 - 77459-5
|
COUNSEL
|
Scoccolo Construction, Inc.
v.
City of Renton
|
John Riper/Robert Marconi
Robert King/Roger Myklebust
Lawrence Warren
|
SYNOPSIS: Renton hired Scoccolo to perform a street widening project. Is Renton liable for costs incurred by Scoccolo as a result of delays caused by utilities operating under franchise agreements with the City?
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided for the convenience of the public only. |
