|
9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
January 11, 2007
|
Case No. 1 - 78238-5
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington
v.
James Douglas Ohlson
|
Randall Sutton/Jeremy Morris
Michelle Adams
|
SYNOPSIS: Is a rule which states excited utterances are per se nontestimonial under Crawford sustainable after Washington v. Davis, 126 S. Ct. 2266 (2006)?
|
Case No. 2 - 78254-7
|
COUNSEL
|
In re Personal Restraint Petition of
Cole W. Shale
|
Eric Nielsen
Kevin Korsmo/Andrew Metts, III
|
SYNOPSIS: Whether some of Petitioner’s convictions violate double jeopardy principles and constitute the “same criminal conduct” for sentencing.
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 - 78668-2
|
COUNSEL
|
William Udall, et al.
v.
TD Escrow Services, Inc., et al.
|
Dale Carlisle/Yvonne Mattson/Bradley Maxa
David Leen
|
SYNOPSIS: Is the purchaser at a nonjudicial foreclosure sale entitled to the property deed, provided that the sale is procedurally valid?
|
Case No. 4 - 78353-5
|
COUNSEL
|
Sayed Zia Ehsani, et al.
v.
The McCullough Family Partnership, et al.
|
Sayed Zia Ehsani, Pro Se/Helmut Kah
Christopher Brain/Allyson Ferguson
|
SYNOPSIS: Whether a judgment creditor’s attorney, who received and disbursed judgment funds on behalf of his clients, must restore those funds to the judgment debtor when said judgment is subsequently reversed?
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided for the convenience of the public only.
|
