| |
| 9:00 A.M. |
Olympia |
TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 2007 |
| Case No. 1 – 74964-7 |
COUNSEL |
State of Washington
v.
Arturo R. Recuenco
|
James Whisman
Gregory Link
|
SYNOPSIS: Is imposing a firearm sentence enhancement based on a deadly weapon finding subject to harmless error analysis under Washington law, and if so, was the error in this case harmless?
|
| Case No. 2 – 75800-0 |
COUNSEL |
In re Personal Restraint Petition of
Ronald A. Hall
|
Rita Griffith/Jeffrey Ellis
John Sheeran
|
SYNOPSIS: Was it a harmless error to sentence Hall to an exceptional sentence based on findings made by the trial court rather than a jury?
|
1:30 P.M.
| Case No. 3 – 79371-9 |
COUNSEL |
State of Washington
v.
Michael A. Boyd
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
State of Washington,
v.
Lee William Giles, et al.
|
Kathleen Proctor/Hugh Birgenheier
Barbara Corey
Kathleen Proctor
Michael Schwartz/Mary Katherine High
|
SYNOPSIS: Can the defendants get copies of visual evidence considered contraband under Washington law?
|
| Case No. 4 – 78452-3 |
COUNSEL |
State of Washington
v.
Ismael Armendariz
|
Scott Leist/James Whisman
Elaine Winters
|
SYNOPSIS: Whether RCW 9.94A.505(8) authorizes trial courts to impose crime-related prohibitions, including no-contact orders, for the statutory maximum term of defendants’ crimes?
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
|
|
