|
9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
Tuesday March 20, 2007
|
Case No. 1 -78514-7
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington
v.
Darrell Everybodytalksabout
|
Deborah Dwyer
Susan Wilk
|
SYNOPSIS: Is a defendant’s statement to a community corrections officer during a presentence interview admissible in a subsequent retrial if the defendant was not informed of his Miranda rights and did not have assistance of counsel?
|
Case No. 2 -78528-7
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington
v.
Justin Bryce Burke
|
Thomas Curtis/Seth Fine
John Browne/Emma Scanlan
|
SYNOPSIS: Was Burke’s right to silence violated when the prosecutor stressed what Burke did not say?
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 -79025-6
|
COUNSEL
|
In re the Personal Restraint Petition of
Donald T. McCarthy
|
Richard Linn
Gregory Rosen/Jay Geck
Michael Kinnie
|
SYNOPSIS: Are certain sex offenders entitled to legal counsel during hearings where the Indeterminate Sentencing Review Board decides whether to release the offenders after serving their minimum term?
|
Case No. 4 -78574-1
|
COUNSEL
|
Spokane School District No. 81
v.
Cowles Publishing Company
|
Paul Clay/John Manix
Brian Kistler
Duane Swinton/Tracy LeRoy
|
SYNOPSIS: Whether a government agency may go to court to find out whether requested records are exempt from disclosure under the Public Records Act and whether the records in this case were exempt.
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
|
