|
| 9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
|
Case No. 1 - 79967-9
|
COUNSEL
|
Feature Realty, Inc.; et al.
v.
Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, Preston, Gates, Ellis, LLP, et al.
|
Robert Gould/Brian Waid
Stephen Sirianni
|
SYNOPSIS: Whether the plaintiff’s dismissal of a California suit following rulings by the California court quashing the summons for lack of personal jurisdiction and staying the proceedings under the doctrine of forum non conveniens constituted a voluntary dismissal subject to the “two dismissal rule” of Civil Rule 41(a)(4).
|
Case No. 2 - 79969-5
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington
v.
David Garrett Reep
|
Frank Jenny, II
Robert Thompson/Lenell Nussbaum
|
SYNOPSIS: Do the search warrants resulting in David Reep’s convictions for voyeurism satisfy the Fourth Amendment’s requirement for particularity?
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 - 79966-1
|
COUNSEL
|
Howard F. Delaney
v.
The Board of Spokane County
Commissioners, et al.
|
Scott Staab/Tracy Staab
James Emacio/Dan Catt
|
SYNOPSIS: Must the Board of Spokane County Commissioners establish and fund a tenth district court judge position?
|
Case No. 4 - 79974-1
|
COUNSEL
|
Mark Ludvigsen
v.
City of Seattle
|
Elizabeth Padula
Moses Garcia
|
SYNOPSIS: Does it offend due process, or violate the ex post facto clause, to apply at trial laws that were amended after a defendant was charged?
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
|
