TWO CASES ONLY – TWO IN A.M.

Case No. 1 - 80110-0	COUNSEL
City of Auburn      v. Teresa A. Hedlund	Daniel Heid Matthew Honeywell
SYNOPSIS: Should Hedlund’s conviction as an accomplice to driving under the influence of alcohol be reversed because she was a victim of the crime?  Did the conviction violate double jeopardy?  Did the trial court admit unfairly prejudicial evidence?

Case No. 2 – 79917-2	COUNSEL
State of Washington      v. Brent Richard Smith	Heather Czebotar Dennis Morgan
SYNOPSIS: Brent Smith was convicted of the manufacture of methamphetamine based upon evidence discovered during a warrantless search of a house.  The court must decide whether an exception to the search warrant requirement justifies the warrantless search of the house.