Case No. 1 - 80391-9	COUNSEL
State of Washington      v. James Daniel Radcliffe	James Powers Peter Tiller
SYNOPSIS: What must police do when a suspect, who already waived his Miranda rights, makes an equivocal request for an attorney?

Case No. 2 – 80535-1	COUNSEL
State of Washington      v. Jason Vincent Powell	Tonya Rulli Riddell John Hays
SYNOPSIS: A lay witness testified he saw Powell use methamphetamines and that Powell was agitated.  This court must decide whether expert testimony was required to explain the effects of methamphetamines even though neither party raised the issue of expert testimony at trial or before the Court of Appeals.

Case No. 3 – 81332-9	COUNSEL
Residents Opposed to Kittitas Turbines, et al.      v. State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC), et al. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Residents Opposed to Kittitas Turbines, et al.      v. State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC), et al. Kittitas County	James Carmody/Jeffrey Slothower Kyle Crews/William Collins/Darrel Peeples Frederick Gentry/Timothy McMahan/Neil Caulkins Susan Drummond/Narda Pierce James Carmody/Jeffrey Slothower Kyle Crews/William Collins/Narda D. Pierce/Darrel Peeples/Frederick Gentry/Timothy McMahan/Susan Drummond Neil Caulkins
SYNOPSIS: Whether this court has jurisdiction to review a petition certified directly from Thurston County Superior Court regarding the governor’s decision to approve an application for the site certification of an energy facility under RCW 80.50.  If so, whether the decision to approve the application was valid.

Case No. 4 – 80219-0	COUNSEL
In re the Recall Charges Against Pat Davis	Suzanne Thomas/Matthew Segal/Jessica Skelton Thomas Kuffel Christopher Clifford (Pro Se)
SYNOPSIS: Whether the petition for recall is factually and legally sufficient as required by Chapter 29.82 RCW.

These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.