9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
May 12, 2009
|
Case No. 1 - 81230-6
|
COUNSEL
|
In re the Detention of
BRYAN DUNCAN
|
Valerie Marushige
Sarah Sappington/Joshua Choate
& Brooke Burbank
|
SYNOPSIS: Did the trial court err by (1) admitting evidence that the defendant refused a pre-trial discovery mental examination, (2) admitting evidence that that the defendant intended to live with a convicted sex offender upon release while refusing to admit evidence that the intended roommate had not reoffended since his release from detention, and (3) refusing to admit evidence regarding the general effectiveness of the sex offender treatment program at the Special Commitment Center?
|
Case No. 2 – 81356-6
|
COUNSEL
|
BIANCA FAUST, et al.
v.
MARK ALBERTSON
BELLINGHAM LODGE #493, et al.
|
Philip Talmadge/Steven Chance/Emmelyn Hart-Biberfeld
William Fitzharris, Jr.
Russell Love/Paul Esposito
|
SYNOPSIS: Must a plaintiff put forward direct, point-in-time evidence of a drunk driver’s appearance of intoxication in order for a jury to render a verdict on a negligent overservice of alcohol claim?
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 – 80653-5
Re-hearing Date - 5/3/2011
|
COUNSEL
|
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
LORETTA LYNN ERIKSEN
|
Ann Stodola
William Johnston
|
SYNOPSIS: Does a tribal officer who witnessed a non-Indian reportedly driving under the influence within the reservation have authority to pursue, stop, and detain the driver outside the reservation boundaries?
|
Case No. 4 – 81445-7
|
COUNSEL
|
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
SANTIAGO RIVERA-SANTOS
|
John Peterson
Anthony Lowe
|
SYNOPSIS: Rivera-Santos was convicted of driving under the influence of intoxicants by the state of Oregon for a course of conduct which began in Washington and ended in Oregon. Does statutory double jeopardy bar Washington from prosecuting Rivera-Santos for the same course of conduct?
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
|