9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
May 14, 2009
|
THREE CASES ONLY – TWO IN A.M. & ONE IN P.M.
Case No. 1 - 82008-2
|
COUNSEL
|
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
JAMES FRANK JAIME
|
Kevin Eilmes
Stephanie Cunningham
|
SYNOPSIS: Did the trial court err when it decided to (1) hold Jaime’s trial in a jailhouse courtroom, and (2) exclude expert testimony regarding the reliability of eyewitness identification?
|
Case No. 2 – 81243-8
|
COUNSEL
|
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
KEITH IAN DOW
|
Amie Hunt
John Hays
|
SYNOPSIS: Does RCW 10.58.035 provide that a defendant’s confession may be the sole evidence used to convict the defendant of the crime charged?
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 – 200,577-2
|
COUNSEL
|
In re:
BRADLEY MARSHALL,
Attorney at Law.
|
Bradley Marshall
Scott Busby (WSBA)
|
SYNOPSIS: An attorney argues that the court should reject the Washington State Bar Association Disciplinary Board’s recommendation that he be disbarred from the practice of law.
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
|
