9:00 A.M. |
Peninsula College |
October 27, 2009 |
TWO CASES ONLY ‑ ONE IN A.M. & ONE IN P.M.
Case No. 1 — 81688-3
|
COUNSEL |
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
CLARENCE ANDREW KINTZ
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
CLARENCE ANDREW KINTZ
|
Eric Richey/Hilary Thomas & Kimberly Thulin
Thomas Matthew Dunn
Eric Richey/Hilary Thomas & Kimberly Thulin
Thomas Matthew Dunn |
SYNOPSIS: What is the meaning of “separate occasions” in RCW 9A.46.110(6)(e), and did sufficient evidence support Kintz’s misdemeanor stalking convictions?
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 2 — 81594-1
|
COUNSEL |
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
ANTHONY JAY ERICKSON
|
Mary Kathleen Webber
Oliver Davis |
SYNOPSIS: May a court issue a bench warrant for failure to appear at a probation violation hearing without a formal finding of probable cause on the underlying allegations?
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public. |