9:00 A.M. |
Olympia |
January 19, 2010 |
|
Case No. 1 — 83024-0
|
COUNSEL |
BELLEVUE SCHOOL DISTRICT
v.
E.S.
|
James Whisman
Robert Boruchowitz
|
SYNOPSIS: Does due process require that children be represented by counsel at initial truancy hearings? |
Case No. 2 — 82474-6
|
COUNSEL |
GEORGE KELLEY, et al.
v.
CENTENNIAL CONTRACTORS
ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
Darrell Cochran/Jason Amala & James Beck
William Spencer/Daira Silvija Faltens |
SYNOPSIS: Was it feasible for the claimant children, who were not represented by a guardian ad litem at the time, to join their loss of parental consortium claim with their parents’ personal injury lawsuit? If so, the children are now barred from asserting their claim because they failed to join that lawsuit. |
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 — 82283-2
|
COUNSEL |
ROBIN M. FREEMAN
v.
ROB FREEMAN
|
Patricia Novotny
Margaret Brost |
SYNOPSIS: When does a trial court abuse its discretion by denying a motion to modify or terminate a permanent order of protection? Is the non-moving party entitled to attorney fees? |
Case No. 4 — 82306-5
|
COUNSEL |
ROGER L. SKINNER
v.
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION of the City
of Medina, et al.
|
William Murphy
P. Stephen DiJulio/Greg Rubstello |
SYNOPSIS: Does a motion for reconsideration toll a statutory 30-day period for appealing a civil service commission’s decision? Does service on a city clerk constitute adequate service on the commission?
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public. |
