9:00 A.M. |
SKAGIT VALLEY COLLEGE |
February 23, 2010 |
|
THREE CASES ONLY — TWO CASES IN A.M. – ONE IN P.M.
Case No. 1 – 82210-7
|
COUNSEL |
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
CORYELL LEVOI ADAMS
|
Stephen Hobbs
Dana Lind |
SYNOPSIS: This case addresses whether evidence obtained through an unconstitutional search may nevertheless be submitted under either the inevitable discovery doctrine or the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule, or whether these doctrines conflict with article I, section 7 of the Washington State Constitution. |
Case No. 2 – 82225-5
|
COUNSEL |
CITY OF PORT ANGELES,
v.
OUR WATER-OUR CHOICE, et al.
v.
WASHINGTON DENTAL SERVICE
FOUNDATION, LLC,
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
OUR WATER-OUR CHOICE, et al.
v.
PORT ANGELES CITY CLERK, et al.
|
William Bloor
Gerald Steel
Roger Pearce & P. Stephen DiJulio
Gerald Steel
William Bloor
|
SYNOPSIS: The Port Angeles City Council decided to fluoridate the city’s water supply. Some city council decisions are subject to initiative. Was this decision one of them? |
1:15 P.M.
Case No. 3 – 81921-1 (consolidated w/81940-8)
|
COUNSEL |
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
LEO B. BUNKER
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
DONALD CARL WILLIAMS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
RACHEL MARIE VINCENT
|
Melody Crick
Christopher Gibson
Randi Austell
Christopher Gibson
Melody Crick
Christopher Gibson
|
SYNOPSIS: Are all violations of no-contact order restraint provisions criminal acts under former RCW 26.50.110(1)?
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public. |
