SYNOPSIS: Was the information charging the defendant with interfering with the reporting of domestic violence (RCW 9A.36.150) constitutionally sufficient?
Case No. 2 – 82142-9 (consolidated w/82973-0)
COUNSEL
NANCY N. WAPLES, et ux
v.
PETER H. YI, DDS, et ux, et al.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
LINDA CUNNINGHAM, et
v.
RONALD F. NICOL, M.D.; et al.
George Steele
John Versnel III & Vanessa Vanderbrug
Jerald Pearson
Elizabeth Leedom/Jennifer Moore/Michael Madden
&Amy Magnano
John Rosendahl/Timothy Ashcraft/Mary Spillane
Daniel Ferm
SYNOPSIS: RCW 7.70.100(1) requires a plaintiff to give health care providers 90-days’ notice of the plaintiff’s intention to file a medical malpractice suit. Is this notice requirement constitutional?
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 – 82567-0
COUNSEL
In re the Personal Restraint Petition of:
SCHAWN J. CRUZE
Jeffrey Ellis
Rachel Probstfeld
SYNOPSIS: Is a firearm enhancement a ‘deadly weapon verdict’ for purposes of former RCW 9.94A.030 (1997)?
Case No. 4 – 81393-1
COUNSEL
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
ROBERT LEE VANCE
Seth Fine
Maureen Marie Cyr
SYNOPSIS: Does the Sixth Amendment right to trial by jury require that a jury, not a judge, make findings of fact to support an exceptional consecutive sentence?
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
