9:00 A.M. |
Olympia |
March 9, 2010 |
|
Case No. 1 – 82219-1
|
COUNSEL |
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
GILBERTO IBARRA-CIZNEROS
|
Gabriel Eliud Acosta/Teresa Chen
Janelle Carman/C. Dale Slack |
SYNOPSIS: Does the taint of an illegally seized cell phone extend to evidence obtained as the result of calls made to that phone while it was in police custody? |
Case No. 2 – 82229-8
|
COUNSEL |
YAKIMA COUNTY
v.
THE YAKIMA HERALD REPUBLIC
and
JOSE LUIS SANCHEZ, JR. |
Paul McIlrath/Stefanie Weigand & Terry Austin
Kenneth Harper/Michele Earl-Hubbard/Christopher Roslaniec/David Norman & Greg Overstreet
Brendan Monahan/Susan Wilk/Gregory Link
& David Donnan
|
SYNOPSIS: Must billing requests for public funds submitted to the court by defense counsel in an ongoing criminal case be released to a newspaper that requested the documents under the Public Records Act? |
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 – 82333-2
|
COUNSEL |
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
JAMES ROBERT NASON
|
Mark Erik Lindsey
Susan Marie Gasch |
SYNOPSIS: Nason’s criminal sentence required him to make monthly payments on his legal financial obligation. If he failed to make his payments, and if he also failed to file a stay of execution, he was required to spend 60 days in jail. Does his sentence violate due process? |
Case No. 4 – 81650-6
|
COUNSEL |
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
TROY DEAN STUBBS
|
Antonio Koures/Brian McDonald
David Gasch/Susan Wilk
|
SYNOPSIS: Can the aggravating circumstance in RCW 9.94A.535(3)(y), that the “victim’s injuries substantially exceed the level of bodily harm necessary to satisfy the elements of the offense,” justify an exceptional sentence for first-degree assault? Is RCW 9.94A.535(3)(y) unconstitutionally vague? |
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
|
