9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
June 24, 2010
|
THREE CASES ONLY TWO IN A.M. – ONE IN P.M.
Case No. 1 – 82687-1
|
COUNSEL |
HUMPHREY INDUSTRIES, LTD
v.
CLAY STREET ASSOCIATES LLC, et al.
|
David Spellman/Stanton Beck
Gregory Hollon/Barbara Schuknecht/Alan Bornstein |
SYNOPSIS: Does a company substantially comply with the dissenter’s rights statute when it pays the dissenting member the fair value of the dissenter’s interest nearly six months after receiving the dissenter’s demand for payment? Also, did the dissenting member act arbitrarily, vexatiously, and not in good faith with respect to this litigation?
|
Case No. 2 – 83038-0
|
COUNSEL |
JERRY D. SMITH, as Personal Representative
of the ESTATE OF BRENDA L. SMITH, Deceased,
et al.
v.
ORTHOPEDICS INTERNATIONAL, LIMITED,
P.S., et al.
|
Thomas Golden/Christopher Otorowski
John Graffe, Jr./Mary Spillane/Daniel Ferm |
SYNOPSIS: Did it amount to prohibited ex parte contact when, prior to a nonparty treating physician’s testimony at trial, defense counsel sent trial documents to the physician’s attorney?
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 – 83156-4
|
COUNSEL |
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
ALEJANDRO GARCIA-SALGADO
|
James Whisman
Gregory Link |
SYNOPSIS: Did the State violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution or article I, section 7 of the Washington State Constitution when it procured Garcia-Salgado’s DNA pursuant to a court order?
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public. |
