9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
September 16, 2010
|
THREE CASES ONLY – TWO IN A.M. – ONE IN P.M.
Case No. 1 - 83579-9
|
COUNSEL
|
Lamtec Corporation
v.
Department of Revenue of the State of Washington
|
Leslie Pesterfield/Jeffrey Dunbar/E. Ross Farr/
Philip Talmadge
Peter Gonick
|
SYNOPSIS: Lamtec Corporation has no personnel or property in Washington, but sends sales representatives to meet with its customers here every year. Are Lamtec's Washington sales exempt from the Business and Occupation Tax?
|
Case No. 2 – 83349-4
|
COUNSEL
|
Kemper Freeman, et al.
v.
Christine O. Gregoire, et al.
Sound Transit
|
Philip Talmadge/Thomas Fitzpatrick/George Kargianis/Kristen Fisher
Bryce Brown, Jr./Maureen Hart
Desmond Brown/Paul Lawrence/Matthew Segal/Jessica Skelton
|
SYNOPSIS: Original action to determine whether a writ lies to prevent the State from entering into a property valuation of the center lanes of I-90.
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 – 82029-5
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington
v.
Richard Henry Mutch aka David Joseph Savanti
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
State of Washington
v.
Richard Henry Mutch aka David Joseph Savanti
|
Hilary Thomas
David Donnan/Nancy Collins
Hon. David McEachran
David Donnan/Nancy Collins
|
SYNOPSIS: At resentencing, after Mutch’s life sentence under the Persistent Offender statute was vacated, Mutch received an exceptional sentence. The court must decide what notice was required and whether the trial court had authority to impose an exceptional sentence.
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
|