9:00 A.M.
|
Gonzaga
|
October 19, 2010
|
THREE CASES ONLY — TWO IN A.M. – ONE IN P.M.
Case No. 1 – 84168-3
|
COUNSEL |
LARRY MICHAELS, et ux, et al.
v.
CH2M HILL, INC., et al.
|
John Layman/George Ahrend/Matthew Albrecht/
Daniel Huntington/Gary Bloom
Charles Wiggins/Kenneth Masters/Terence Scanlan
|
SYNOPSIS: Part of a sewage treatment plant collapsed. Is the engineering firm that was consulting on a plant retrofit immune from suit under the Industrial Insurance Act?
|
Case No. 2 – 83709-1
|
COUNSEL |
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
TIMOTHY SEAN MARTIN
|
Seth Fine/Mary Webber
Vanessa Mi-jo Lee/Lila Silverstein |
SYNOPSIS: Does it violate article I, section 22 of the Washington Constitution for the State to imply that a defendant tailored his testimony to fit the State’s evidence?
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 – 83677-9
|
COUNSEL |
CITY OF SEATTLE
v.
ROBERT JOSEPH MAY
|
Richard Greene
Christine Jackson |
SYNOPSIS: May was convicted of violating a permanent domestic violence protection order. The court must decide whether the order was void because it lacked a finding that future acts of domestic violence were likely and whether May could be prosecuted under municipal code when the order specified WA State law.
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
|
