Case No. 1 - 83715-5	COUNSEL
Maureen T. Blair, et al.      v. TA-Seattle East #176, DBA Travel Centers of America	Kenneth Masters Rodney Umberger, Jr./Daniel Ferm
SYNOPSIS: The court considers the meaning of a local court rule and whether a trial court needed to make particular findings when imposing a punishment for a violation of a court order.

Case No. 2 – 83797-0	COUNSEL
State of Washington      v. JASON A. WILSON	Gerald Fuller Vanessa Mi-jo Lee/Nancy Collins
SYNOPSIS: If a gross misdemeanor is mistaken for a felony in an offender’s sentencing score, is this a legal or factual error? The distinction matters because factual errors may be waived, while legal errors may entitle a defendant to be resentenced with a lower score.

Case No. 3 – 83525-0 (consolidated w/83613-2)	COUNSEL
State of Washington      v. Michael Wayne Robinson - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - State of Washington      v. Francisco Javier Millan	Carol La Verne Thomas Doyle Stephen Trinen Kathryn Russell Selk
SYNOPSIS: Can a criminal defendant challenge the admissibility of evidence for the first time on appeal based on a new constitutional interpretation? If so, does the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule justify admission of the evidence?

Case No. 4 – 83742-2	COUNSEL
In re the Personal Restraint Petition of Glenn Gary NicholS	Deborah Dwyer Lila Silverstein
SYNOPSIS: The court must decide whether the defendant’s case is properly before the court, and if so, if getting information about the defendant from a motel registry without a warrant violated the defendant’s rights under the Washington State Constitution.

These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.