9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
October 26, 2010
|
Case No. 1 - 83715-5
|
COUNSEL
|
Maureen T. Blair, et al.
v.
TA-Seattle East #176, DBA Travel Centers of America
|
Kenneth Masters
Rodney Umberger, Jr./Daniel Ferm
|
SYNOPSIS: The court considers the meaning of a local court rule and whether a trial court needed to make particular findings when imposing a punishment for a violation of a court order.
|
Case No. 2 – 83797-0
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington
v.
JASON A. WILSON
|
Gerald Fuller
Vanessa Mi-jo Lee/Nancy Collins
|
SYNOPSIS: If a gross misdemeanor is mistaken for a felony in an offender’s sentencing score, is this a legal or factual error? The distinction matters because factual errors may be waived, while legal errors may entitle a defendant to be resentenced with a lower score.
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 – 83525-0 (consolidated w/83613-2)
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington
v.
Michael Wayne Robinson
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
State of Washington
v.
Francisco Javier Millan
|
Carol La Verne
Thomas Doyle
Stephen Trinen
Kathryn Russell Selk
|
SYNOPSIS: Can a criminal defendant challenge the admissibility of evidence for the first time on appeal based on a new constitutional interpretation? If so, does the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule justify admission of the evidence?
|
Case No. 4 – 83742-2
|
COUNSEL
|
In re the Personal Restraint Petition of
Glenn Gary NicholS
|
Deborah Dwyer
Lila Silverstein
|
SYNOPSIS: The court must decide whether the defendant’s case is properly before the court, and if so, if getting information about the defendant from a motel registry without a warrant violated the defendant’s rights under the Washington State Constitution.
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
|
