| 9:00 A.M. |
OLYMPIA |
October 27, 2011 |
Case No. 1 - 83690-6
|
COUNSEL
|
ELCON CONSTRUCTION, INC.
v.
EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
|
Kevin Roberts/Robert Dunn/Michael Tucker
Jarold Cartwright/Carl Warring/Catherine Hendricks
|
| SYNOPSIS: This case involves a claim for damages relating to a drilling contract. The Court must decide whether Elcon may recover tort damages in addition to contract damages and whether Elcon is entitled to statutory interest on its arbitration award.
|
Case No. 2 - 85549-8
|
COUNSEL
|
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
JOHN ROBERT HURST
|
Donna Wise
Mindy Carr/Nancy Collins
|
| SYNOPSIS: Does the 14th Amendment Due Process Clause require proof of statutory commitment standards by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence in order to detain an incompetent criminal defendant for a third period?
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 – 85511-1
|
COUNSEL
|
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
LINDY DEER
|
Andrea Vitalich
Lila Silverstein
|
| SYNOPSIS: Does rape of a child in the third degree have an implied element of volition that the prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt?
|
Case No. 4 – 84949-8
|
COUNSEL
|
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
JORGE ARIEL SAENZ
|
Kevin Eilmes
Tanesha La Trelle Canzater
|
| SYNOPSIS: If a 15-year-old is tried as an adult, can his conviction be used as a “strike” if the transfer of his case from juvenile to adult court was handled improperly?
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public. |
