9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
November 10, 2011
|
Case No. 1 - 84894-7
|
COUNSEL
|
Scott E. Stafne
v.
Snohomish County, et al.
|
Scott Stafne/Michael King
Bree Urban/John Moffat
|
SYNOPSIS: When a party appeals a county’s decision related to a comprehensive plan under the Growth Management Act, must that party appeal to the growth management hearings board or may that party file a land use petition in superior court under the Land Use Petition Act?
|
Case No. 2 - 85810-1
|
COUNSEL
|
Chad Minnick; Et Al.
v.
Clearwire US, LLC; Does 1 through 10
|
Felix Luna/Jonathan Tycko/Melanie Jenae Williamson
Kenneth Payson/Stephen Rummage/Rebecca Francis
|
SYNOPSIS: Does Washington law treat an early termination fee in a telecommunications contract as an alternative performance provision or a liquidated damages clause?
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 – 85342-8
|
COUNSEL
|
Ronald and Deborah Teter, Husband and Wife
v.
Andrew Deck, M.D.
|
Peter Vial/Barbara Himes Schuknecht/Avi Lipman
Matthew Menzer/Mary Spillane/Mark Davidson
|
SYNOPSIS: The Court must decide if the trial court properly granted plaintiffs Ron & Deborah Teter a new trial.
|
Case No. 4 – 86084-0
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington
v.
Joseph Thomas Mcenroe
|
Andrea Vitalich/ Scott O’Toole
Kathryn Lund Ross/Leo Hamaji/William Prestia
|
SYNOPSIS: If a trial court denies a party’s motion to seal documents, can the party withdraw those documents from consideration or must they be filed immediately with the clerk and open to the public?
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
|
