9:00 A.M. |
Olympia |
February 14, 2012 |
Case No. 1 - 200,926-3
|
COUNSEL
|
In re:
Thomas r. Kamb,
an Attorney at Law.
|
Brett Purtzer
M. Craig Bray (WSBA)
|
SYNOPSIS: The Court must determine whether attorney Thomas R. Kamb violated the Rules of Professional Conduct and impose appropriate sanctions for any violations.
|
Case No. 2 - 85949-3
|
COUNSEL
|
Randy Anfinson, et al.
v.
Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
|
William Rutzick/Martin Garfinkel
Lawrence Schwerin/Dmitri Iglitzin
Kelly Corr/Guy Michelson/Kevin Baumgardner & Emily Brubaker
Howard Goodfriend/Catherine Wright Smith
|
SYNOPSIS: Did the trial court correctly instruct the jury on how to distinguish between employees and independent contractors? Did the trial court correctly instruct the jury on proof of class members’ employee status? If the trial court’s instructions were erroneous, was the class prejudiced? Also, does judicial estoppel apply to Anfinson’s legal argument?
|
1:30 P.M.
James Gorman IV
v.
City of Woodinville
|
Catherine Clark
Greg Rubstello
|
SYNOPSIS: RCW 4.16.160 prohibits claims “predicated on the lapse of time” from being asserted against the government. Does this statute bar a claim of title brought against a city when the plaintiff claims to have acquired title by adverse possession before the land was dedicated to the government?
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
|
