9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
March 13, 2011
|
THREE CASES ONLY – TWO IN A.M. – ONE IN P.M.
Case No. 1 - 86135-8
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington
v.
Monte W. Hunley
|
Pamela Loginsky/Gerald Fuller/James Baker
Manek Mistry/Jodi Backlund
|
SYNOPSIS: Is it constitutional for a sentencing court to base a criminal defendant’s offender score on prior convictions that were established only by the prosecutor’s summary assertion and the defendant’s failure to object?
|
Case No. 2 - 85791-1
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington
v.
Douglas Craig Rose
|
Megan Bredeweg
Nancy Collins/Lindsay Calkins
|
SYNOPSIS: Rose was convicted of taking a never-activated credit card bearing another person’s name, which had accompanied an offer to open a new account. Was the card an “access device” within the meaning of RCW 9A.56.010(1)? Was there probable cause to support a warrantless search of Rose?
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 – 85732-6
|
COUNSEL
|
Rogelio H. A. Ruvalcaba, et ux
v.
Kwang Ho Baek, et ux
and
William V. Kitchin, et ux
|
Pierre Acebedo
Howard Goodfriend
Jackson Schmidt
Timothy Graham
|
SYNOPSIS: Can landowners condemn a private way of necessity after voluntarily landlocking their own property and does the statute of limitations or laches apply to these type of actions?
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
|
