| 9:00 A.M. |
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON |
May 3, 2012 |
| THREE CASES ONLY – TWO IN A.M. – ONE IN P.M. |
| Case No. 1 - 85984-1 |
COUNSEL |
GAYE DIANA MUNICH, as Personal Representative for the Estate of William R. Munich
v.
SKAGIT EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION
CENTER d/b/a SKAGIT 911, SKAGIT COUNTY, et al. |
Ray Kahler/Kevin Coluccio/Paul Whelan
Shannon Ragonesi/Mark Bucklin
Rhianna Fronapfel/Duncan Fobes |
SYNOPSIS: Must a plaintiff show a 911 operator’s assurances promising action were false or inaccurate in order to establish a special relationship under the public duty doctrine? |
| Case No. 2 - 86835-2 |
COUNSEL |
GAVIN J. CREGAN
v.
FOURTH MEMORIAL CHURCH, a non-profit Washington corporation d/b/a RIVERVIEW BIBLE CAMP |
Daniel Huntington
Matthew Ries |
SYNOPSIS: Can a private camp that ordinarily charges admission fees be shielded from negligence liability under the recreational use immunity statute, RCW 4.24.200-210, if the injured party was allowed free admission? |
1:30 P.M.
| Case No. 3 - 200,983-2 |
COUNSEL |
In re:
Paul Eugene Simmerly, Attorney at Law.
|
Kurt Bulmer
Joanne Abelson (WSBA)
|
SYNOPSIS: Does substantial evidence support findings that attorney Paul E. Simmerly violated the Rules of Professional Conduct and, if so, does he deserve disbarment for the violations? |
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public. |
