9:00 A.M. |
Olympia |
May 23, 2013 |
| THREE CASES ONLY - TWO IN A.M. - ONE IN P.M. |
Case No. 1 - 88208-8
|
COUNSEL
|
PT AIR WATCHERS, et al.
v.
STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY, et al.
|
David Mann
Katharine Shirey/Peter Gonick/Svend Brandt-Erichsen & Dustin Till
|
SYNOPSIS: Whether the Department of Ecology, in determining that no environmental impact statement was necessary for a proposed project, failed to adequately consider the effects of carbon dioxide emissions and demand for woody biomass, and whether the project is exempt from the environmental impact statement requirement as part of an energy recovery facility that existed before January 1, 1989. |
Case No. 2 - 87614-2
|
COUNSEL
|
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
BRENDA J. ZILLYETTE
|
Gerald Fuller
John Hays
|
SYNOPSIS: Is an information charging a defendant with controlled substances homicide valid when it fails to specify what drug killed the victim? |
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 - 88317-3
|
COUNSEL
|
SCOTT CORNELIUS, et al.
v.
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY, et al.
|
Rachael Paschal Osborn
Alan Reichman/Diane McDaniel/Frank Hruban
Sarah Mack & Lynne Cohee
|
SYNOPSIS: Whether the Pollution Control Hearings Board correctly determined that the Department of Ecology did not violate the Washington Constitution or Revised Code when it approved Washington State University's applications to amend the water rights serving the Pullman campus.
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
|
