| 9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
January 23, 2013
|
THREE CASES ONLY - TWO IN A.M. - ONE IN P.M.
| Case No. 1 - 88460-9
|
COUNSEL
|
Teresa Schmidt
v.
Timothy P. Coogan, et al.
|
Dan'L Bridges
Paul Lindenmuth/Benjamin Barcus
|
SYNOPSIS: This case presents multiple issues relating to legal malpractice claims, including the collectibility of an underlying judgment and available damages.
|
| Case No. 2 - 88575-3
|
COUNSEL
|
Riverview Community Group
v.
Spencer & Livingston, et al.
|
David Boswell
David Kulisch/Michael Grover/Peter Scott/David Mann/
Brendan Donckers
|
SYNOPSIS: Should the court dismiss a claim seeking to force the defendants to operate a golf course at a financial loss because the relief sought is too harsh?
|
1:30 P.M.
| Case No. 3 - 88772-1
|
COUNSEL
|
Robert Campbell
v.
Department Of Employment Security
|
Marcus Lampson
Leah Harris/Erika Uhl/Rebecca Glasgow
|
SYNOPSIS: Did the agency err in denying Campbell unemployment benefits under RCW 50.20.050(2)(b)(iii), the “quit to follow” provision.
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public. |
