9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
March 20, 2013
|
THREE CASES ONLY – TWO IN A.M. – ONE IN P.M.
Case No. 1 - 88341-6
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington
v.
W.R., Jr.
|
Deborah Dwyer
Gregory Link
|
SYNOPSIS: The Court considers whether a defendant may be assigned the burden of proving consent as a defense to a charge of rape by forcible compulsion, in light of the Due Process Clause.
|
Case No. 2 - 89303-9
|
COUNSEL
|
FutureSelect Portfolio Management, Inc., et al.
v.
Tremont Group Holdings, Inc., et al.
|
Jeffrey Thomas/Jeffrey Tilden
Emily Alexander/Steven Thomas
Timothy Filer/Seth Schwartz/Jason Vigna
David Taylor/Cori Gordon Moore
David Kotler/Christopher Howard/Averil Budge
Rothrock/Claire Been/Stephen
Rummage/Roger Leishman/Robert Hubbell
|
SYNOPSIS: This case asks whether (1) the laws of Washington or those of New York apply to the dispute; (2) Oppenheimer has sufficient contacts with Washington to give our courts power over it; and (3) Ernst and Young can be a seller under the Washington state securities act.
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 - 89377-2
|
COUNSEL
|
Kathryn Scrivener
v.
Clark College
|
Sue-Del McCulloch
Christopher Lanese
|
SYNOPSIS: Whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment to the employer in an age discrimination case.
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public. |
