9:00 A.M. |
Olympia |
May 8, 2014
|
Case No. 1 - 89369-1
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington
v.
Edwin Troy Hawkins
|
W. Gordon Edgar
Carl Hueber/Collette Leland
|
SYNOPSIS: Did the trial court properly grant a new trial due to newly discovered evidence? And, did the new date set for trial violate the defendant’s right to a speedy trial?
|
Case No. 2 - 89251-2
|
COUNSEL
|
In re the Personal Restraint Petition of
Alan Meirhofer
|
Lila Silverstein
Tricia Boerger/Sarah Sappington
|
SYNOPSIS: The case concerns the sexually violent predator statute. The issue is whether the State establish a prima facie case for continued confinement when the sexually violent predator’s diagnosis changed and his likelihood of re-offending decreased. If the answer is yes, may the individual seek relief through a personal restraint petition?
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 - 89317-9
|
COUNSEL
|
Sentinelc3, Inc.
v.
Chris J. Hunt, et al.
|
Kjirstin Graham/Thomas Bassett
Vicki Mitchell/Christopher Crago
Janae & Michael Blood (pro se)
|
SYNOPSIS: Did the shareholders submit enough evidence at trial to defeat the corporation’s motion for summary judgment on the value of their shares?
|
Case No. 4 - 88921-0
|
COUNSEL
|
In re the Personal Restraint Petition of
Gregory O. Thomas
|
Andrew Zinner
Deborah Dwyer
|
SYNOPSIS: Does the rule announced by the U.S. Supreme Court in Miller v. Alabama, prohibiting mandatory sentences of life without parole for juveniles, apply to a juvenile offender sentenced to 999 months in prison?
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
|
