9:00 A.M. |
Olympia |
June 12, 2014 |
THREE CASES ONLY – TWO IN A.M. – ONE IN P.M.
Case No. 1 - 88938-4
|
COUNSEL
|
A.G., by and through his parents, J.G. and K.G., et al.
v.
Premera Blue Cross, et al.
|
Richard Spoonemore/Eleanor Hamburger
Barbara Duffy/Gwendolyn Payton/Ryan McBride
|
SYNOPSIS: Does the definition of “mental health services” in the Mental Health Parity Act include medically necessary neurodevelopmental therapies when the therapies are used to treat mental disorders?
|
Case No. 2 - 88940-6
|
COUNSEL
|
O.S.T., by and through his parents, G.T. and E.S., et al.
v.
Regence Blueshield
|
Richard Spoonemore/Eleanor Hamburger
Timothy Parker/Jason Anderson/Gregory Miller
|
SYNOPSIS: Does the definition of “mental health services” in the Mental Health Parity Act include medically necessary neurodevelopmental therapies when the therapies are used to treat mental disorders?
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 - 89786-7
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington
v.
Christopher Nelson Maynard
|
Lacey Lorene Skalisky
John Hays
|
SYNOPSIS: Did the trial court properly dismiss charges due to prosecutorial delay and ineffective assistance of counsel, when the defendant turned 18 shortly after being charged and therefore lost the benefit of adjudication in juvenile court?
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
|
