| |
9:00 A.M. |
Olympia |
September 9, 2014 |
| ONLY THREE CASES SCHEDULED |
Case No. 1 - 89917-7
|
COUNSEL
|
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
DARCUS DEWAYNE ALLEN
|
Kathleen Proctor/Thomas Roberts
Gregory Link
|
SYNOPSIS: First, does a prosecutor commit misconduct when he misstated the law to the jury? Second, can a defendant's sentence be increased based solely on the conduct of his accomplice?
|
Case No. 2 - 89742-5
|
COUNSEL
|
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
LARRY ALAN HAYES
|
Kathleen Proctor
Nancy Collins
|
SYNOPSIS: Whether in a criminal prosecution the trial court may impose an exceptional sentence on an offender convicted as an accomplice on the basis the crime constituted a major economic offense.
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 - 89866-9
|
COUNSEL
|
PHYLLIS PAETSCH
v.
SPOKANE DERMATOLOGY CLINIC, P.S., et al.
|
Mary Schultz
William Etter/Ronald Van Wert/Mary Spillane
|
SYNOPSIS: Paetsch was injured when a certified physician's assistant (PA-C) employed by the clinic performed cosmetic surgery, and when that PA-C later misdiagnosed her reaction to the surgery. The court must decide whether the doctor who owned the clinic was properly dismissed from the suit, and whether the trial court's instructions to the jury were proper
|
|
|
