9:00 A.M. |
Olympia |
October 23, 2014 |
Case No. 1 - 90037-0
|
COUNSEL
|
JOHN WORTHINGTON
v.
WEST NET
|
John Worthington
Ione George/Pamela Loginsky
|
SYNOPSIS: Whether the multijurisdictional, multiagency drug task force, WestNET, is an “agency” subject to suit under the Public Records Act.
|
Case No. 2 - 90115-5
|
COUNSEL
|
HAL MOORE and MELANIE MOORE, et al.
v.
STEVE'S OUTBOARD SERVICE, et al.
|
Dennis Reynolds
Bruce Finlay
|
SYNOPSIS: Is it a nuisance per se to operate a business without a necessary permit?
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 - 90154-6
|
COUNSEL
|
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
MARSELE KENITH HENDERSON
|
Kimberley DeMarco
Lila Silverstein
|
SYNOPSIS: The defendant was convicted of first degree murder by extreme indifference to human life. Should the jury have been given the option of convicting him of manslaughter?
|
Case No. 4 - 88913-9
|
COUNSEL
|
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
EDWARD MICHAEL GLASMANN
|
Kara Sanchez/Thomas Roberts
Mary KatherineYoung High
|
SYNOPSIS: The trial court instructed the jury that it may convict the defendant of a lower-degree crime if the jurors are unable to agree on a higher-degree crime. When the jury leaves the higher-degree verdict form blank but convicts the defendant of a lower-degree crime, do the state and federal double jeopardy clauses prohibit the defendant from later being retried on the higher-degree charge?
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
|