9:00 A.M.
|
SEATTLE UNIVERSITY
|
February 10, 2015
|
THREE CASES ONLY – TWO IN A.M. – ONE IN P.M.
Case No. 1 - 90281-0
|
COUNSEL
|
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
WILLIAM MICHAEL REIS
|
James Morrissey Whisman
Kurt Edward Boehl/Stephanie Joanna Boehl
|
SYNOPSIS: The governor vetoed a section of a 2011 bill that would have established a registry for medical users of marijuana. She did not veto another section that would have decriminalized use of marijuana by medical users who recorded their medical use with the vetoed registry. Did the remaining references to the registry survive the veto, with the result that medical use of marijuana remains criminal unless the user proves an affirmative defense of authorized use?
|
Case No. 2 - 90291-7
|
COUNSEL
|
MAGDALENO GAMBOA, et ux.
v.
JOHN M. CLARK, et ux.
|
Kevan Tino Montoya/Tyler Michael Hinckley
Christopher Martin Constantine
|
SYNOPSIS: Can the Gamboas continue using their neighbor’s driveway as they have for many years?
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 - 89657-7
|
COUNSEL
|
In the Matter of the Personal Restraint Petition of
ZAHID AZIZ KHAN
|
Jeffrey Erwin Ellis
Seth Aaron Fine
|
SYNOPSIS: Whether the Acting Chief Judge at the Court of Appeals issued an order in violation of former RAP 16.11(b) and whether trial counsel was ineffective for (1) failing to provide an English language interpreter, (2) failing to object to alleged prosecutorial misconduct, or (3) failing to investigate and present expert witness testimony.
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
|
