9:00 A.M. |
Olympia |
November 17, 2015 |
Case No. 1 - 90188-1
|
COUNSEL
|
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
CHAD EDWARD DUNCAN
|
David Brian Trefry/Tamara Ann Hanlon
Susan Marie Gasch
|
SYNOPSIS: May Duncan challenge for the first time on appeal the trial court's failure to consider his ability to pay fines?
|
Case No. 2 - 90194-5
|
COUNSEL
|
MATTHEW A. NEWMAN, et al.
v.
HIGHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 203
|
Richard Adler/Arthur Leritz/Melissa Carter/Frederick Langer/ Michael Nelson/Howard Goodfriend/Ian Cairns & Catherine Wright Smith
Mark Northcraft/Andrew Biggs
|
SYNOPSIS: Under Upjohn, does a corporation's attorney-client privilege protect post-employment communications between the corporation's attorneys and former employees of the corporation?
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 - 91488-5
|
COUNSEL
|
In the Matter of the Estate of EVA JOHANNA ROVA BARNES, Deceased
|
Kevin Walter Cure
Howard Mark Goodfriend/Kevin Walter Cure/John Frank Mitchell/Kenneth Wendell Masters & David P. Horton
|
SYNOPSIS: Did the trial court properly find that the contested will was a product of undue influence?
|
Case No. 4 - 91387-1
|
COUNSEL
|
BEVERLY R. VOLK, et al.
v.
JAMES B. DEMEERLEER, et al.
|
Michael Jon Riccelli/Bruce E. Cox
Robert F. Sestero, II/Michael Early McFarland, Jr./ Christopher Joseph Kerley & David A. Kulisch
|
SYNOPSIS: The court must decide if a psychiatrist treating an outpatient owes a duty to anyone foreseeably threatened by the outpatient's dangerous tendencies.
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public. |