9:00 A.M. |
OLYMPIA |
January 28, 2016 |
THREE CASES ONLY; TWO IN A.M. - ONE IN P.M.
Case No. 1 - 91775-2 |
COUNSEL |
N.L.
v.
BETHEL SCHOOL DISTRICT |
Julie Anne Kays & John Robert Connelly, Jr.
Francis Stanley Floyd & John Armen Safarli
|
SYNOPSIS: What is the scope of a school district's duty to protect its students from a registered sex offender among them? |
Case No. 2 - 92398-1 |
COUNSEL |
DOT FOODS, INC.
v.
STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE |
Michele G. Radosevich & Dirk Jay Giseburt
Kelly Owings & Charles Zalesky |
SYNOPSIS: Can a retroactive amendment to an exemption from the B&O tax be lawfully applied to Dot Foods? |
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 - 91531-8 |
COUNSEL |
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
CURTIS G. STUMP |
Gretchen E. Verhoef
Jan Trasen, Marla Leslie Zink & David L. Donnan
|
SYNOPSIS: Did the State "substantially prevail" on appeal for purposes of awarding costs under RAP 14.2 when the Court of Appeals commissioner granted appointed appellate counsel's Anders motion to withdraw and dismissed the appeal without addressing the merits of the case? |
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public. |
