| |
| 9:00 A.M
|
Olympia
|
March 15, 2016
|
THREE CASES ONLY; TWO IN A.M. – ONE IN P.M.
| Case No. 1 – 92708-1
|
COUNSEL
|
TONY LEE, an individual taxpayer; ANGELA BARTELS, an individual taxpayer; DAVID FROCKT, an individual taxpayer and Washington State Senator; REUVEN CARLYLE, an individual taxpayer and Washington State representative; EDEN MACK, an individual taxpayer; GERALD REILLY, an individual taxpayer; PAUL BELL, an individual taxpayer, and THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF WASHINGTON,
Respondents,
v.
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, TIM EYMAN, LEO J. FAGAN and M. J. FAGAN,
Appellants.
|
Paul J. Lawrence
Kymberly Kathryn Evanson
Sarah Stewart Washburn
Hon. Bob Ferguson
Callie Anne Castillo
Rebecca R. Glasgow
Richard M. Stephens
|
| SYNOPSIS: Does Initiative 1366 violate article II, section 19, article XXIII, or article II, section 1 of the Washington State Constitution?
|
| Case No. 2 – 92021-4
|
COUNSEL
|
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
Respondent,
v.
ANTHONY TYRONE CLARK,
Petitioner.
|
Hon. Mark Lindquist
Brian Neal Wasankari
Thomas Roberts
Kathleen Proctor
Casey Grannis
|
| SYNOPSIS: Was it ineffective assistance to not object when the jury was informed there was no death penalty, and was it error to exclude certain evidence?
|
1:30 P.M.
| Case No. 3 – 91963-1
|
COUNSEL
|
CLARK COUNTY,
Respondent,
v.
PATRICK J. McMANUS,
Petitioner,
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES,
Other Party.
|
Brett Schoepper
James L. Gress
Steven L. Busick
Douglas Maclean Palmer
Anastasia R. Sandstrom
|
| SYNOPSIS: Must a jury give special consideration to the attending physician’s testimony in a workers’ compensation case?
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
|
|
