| 9:00 A.M |
Olympia |
October 13, 2016 |
THREE CASES ONLY; TWO IN A.M. – ONE IN P.M.
| Case No. 1 – 92552-6 |
COUNSEL |
Quinault Indian Nation, et al.
v.
City of Hoquiam, et al. |
Kristen Boyles
Eric 'Knoll' Lowney
Karen Allston
Thomas Young/Dionne Padilla-Huddleston
Jay Derr/Tadas Kisielius/Duncan Greene/Stephen Scheele
Svend Brandt-Erichsen
Steven Ross Johnson |
| SYNOPSIS: Do two planned fuel storage facilities near WA’s Pacific Coast require review under the Ocean Resources Mgmt. Act? |
| Case No. 2 – 92389-2 |
COUNSEL |
State of Washington
v.
Fabian Arredondo |
Hon. Joseph Brusic
David Trefry
Jennifer Joseph (Special Deputy)
Oliver Davis |
| SYNOPSIS: Is the inclusion of evidence of defendant’s motive or exclusion of a witness’ credibility evidence grounds for reversal? |
1:30 P.M.
| Case No. 3 – 92805-3 |
COUNSEL |
Snohomish County, et al.
v.
Pollution Control Hearings Board, et al.
|
Joseph Rochelle, III/Devon Shannon/Darren Carnell
Alethea Hart/Laura Kisielius
James Denver Howsley
Dionne Padilla-Huddleston/Ronald Lavigne, Jr./
Phyllis Barney
Janette Brimmer/Jan Hasselman |
| SYNOPSIS: Does the vested rights doctrine apply to stormwater regulations that local governments must adopt as part of the CWA? |
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public. |
