| 9:00 A.M |
Olympia |
June 9, 2020 |
| Case No. 1 - 97681-3 |
COUNSEL |
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
JOHN W. JACKSON SR.
|
Hon. Mark Nichols, Jesse Espinoza
Nancy P. Collins
|
SYNOPSIS: Was the use of restraints at Jackson's court proceedings without an inquiry into need for restraints harmless error?
|
| Case No. 2 - 98083-7 |
COUNSEL |
EVETTE BURGESS
v.
LITHIA MOTORS, INC.; BMW of SPOKANE d/b/a
CAMP AUTOMOTIVE, INC. d/b/a BMW OF
SPOKANE
|
Mary Elizabeth Schultz
John Michael Silk, Gabriella Wagner, Lisa C. Neal
|
SYNOPSIS: Does the Federal Arbitration Act authorize courts to intervene and potentially rescind the arbitration agreement once arbitration begins?
|
1:30 P.M.
| Case No. 3 - 97734-8 |
COUNSEL |
ROGER LEISHMAN
v.
OGDEN, MURPHY WALLACE PLLC, and
PATRICK PEARCE
|
Roger Ashley Leishman
Robert M. Sulkin, Claire Martirosian, Paul J.
Lawrence, Shae Blood
|
SYNOPSIS: Under Washington's anti-SLAPP act, is a government contractor a "person" entitled to immunity?
|
| Case No. 4 - 97496-9 |
COUNSEL |
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
SIMON ORTIZ MARTINEZ
|
Hon. Dan Satterberg, Carla Barbieri Carlstrom
Maureen Marie Cyr
|
SYNOPSIS: Should we adhere to a doctrine that lets the State introduce a complainant's out-of-court complaints of sexual assault?
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
***Assisted Listening Devices are available through the Bailiff*** |
