| Note: This opinion is no longer available on this site.  To find the official opinion go the Washington State Judicial Opinions Website 
	
	 
 
Court of Appeals Division I 
	 State of Washington 
Opinion Information Sheet 
	
	
		| Docket Number: | 68048-0 |  
		| Title of Case: | Town Of Woodway, Respondent V. Bsre Point Wells, Lp., Appellant |  
		| File Date: | 01/07/2013 |  
	SOURCE OF APPEAL----------------
 
			| Appeal from King County Superior Court |  | Docket No: | 11-2-31315-8 |  | Judgment or order under review |  | Date filed: | 12/07/2011 |  | Judge signing: | Honorable Dean S Lum |  
	JUDGES------
 
	
		| Authored by | Linda Lau |  | Concurring: | C. Kenneth Grosse |  |  | Ronald Cox |  
	COUNSEL OF RECORD-----------------
 
	
			| Counsel for Appellant(s)
 |  |  | Mark Robert Johnsen |  |  | Attorney at Law |  |  | 1201 3rd Ave Ste 2900 |  |  | Seattle, WA, 98101-3284 |  | 
 |  |  | Douglas Alan Luetjen |  |  | Karr Tuttle Campbell |  |  | 1201 3rd Ave Ste 2900 |  |  | Seattle, WA, 98101-3028 |  | 
 |  |  | Gary Dennis Huff |  |  | Attorney at Law |  |  | 1201 3rd Ave Ste 2900 |  |  | Seattle, WA, 98101-3284 |  | 
 |  |  | John Roberts Moffat |  |  | Civil Div Snohomish County Prosecutor's |  |  | 3000 Rockefeller Ave |  |  | Everett, WA, 98201-4046 |  | 
 |  |  | Martin Dominic Rollins |  |  | Civil Division, Snohomish County Prosecu |  |  | 3000 Rockefeller Ave |  |  | Everett, WA, 98201-4046 |  | 
 |  |  | Matthew a Otten |  |  | Snohomish County Prosecutor's Office/Civ |  |  | 3000 Rockefeller Ave |  |  | Everett, WA, 98201-4046 |  | Counsel for Respondent(s)
 |  |  | Wayne Douglas Tanaka |  |  | Ogden Murphy Wallace |  |  | 901 5th Ave Ste 3500 |  |  | Seattle, WA, 98164-2008 |  | 
 |  |  | Zachary R Hiatt |  |  | Graham & Dunn PC |  |  | Pier 70 |  |  | 2801 Alaskan Way Ste 300 |  |  | Seattle, WA, 98121-1128 |  | Amicus Curiae on behalf of Building Industry Association of
 |  |  | Julie Sund Nichols |  |  | Law Offices of Stephen Whitehouse |  |  | Po Box 1273 |  |  | Shelton, WA, 98584-0952 |  
	 
 
	  View the Slip Opinion(s) Filed for this Case.
  View a Printer Friendly Version of this Opinion Information Sheet.
 
	
 |