|
 View the Slip Opinion(s) Filed for this Case.
Tip: Opinions open faster in Edge, Chrome, and FireFox once the FireFox PDF reader has been disabled.
 View a Printer Friendly Version of this Opinion Information Sheet.
DO NOT CITE. SEE GR 14.1(a).
Court of Appeals Division II
State of Washington
Opinion Information Sheet
| Docket Number: |
56733-4 |
| Title of Case: |
Paul Brain, Et Al, Apps/cross-resp V. Canterwood Homeowners Assoc., Resp/cross-app |
| File Date: |
07/18/2023 |
SOURCE OF APPEAL
----------------
| Appeal from Pierce County Superior Court |
| Docket No: | 21-2-07619-1 |
| Judgment or order under review |
| Date filed: | 01/31/2022 |
| Judge signing: | Honorable Stanley J Rumbaugh |
JUDGES
------
| Authored by | Meng Li Che |
| Concurring: | Ian S Birk |
| Rebecca Glasgow |
COUNSEL OF RECORD
-----------------
Counsel for Appellant(s) |
| | Paul Edward Brain |
| | Brain Law Firm PLLC |
| | 950 Pacific Ave Ste 700 |
| | Tacoma, WA, 98402-4450 |
Counsel for Respondent(s) |
| | Mark Bradley Tuvim |
| | Gordon & Rees LLP |
| | 701 5th Ave Ste 2100 |
| | Seattle, WA, 98104-7084 |
|
| | Mark Ronald Roberts |
| | Roberts Johns & Hemphill, PLLC |
| | 7525 Pioneer Way Ste 202 |
| | Gig Harbor, WA, 98335-1166 |
|
| | Michael Wayne Johns |
| | Roberts Johns & Hemphill, PLLC |
| | 7525 Pioneer Way Ste 202 |
| | Gig Harbor, WA, 98335-1166 |
Counsel for Appellant/Cross-Respondent |
| | Paul Edward Brain |
| | Brain Law Firm PLLC |
| | 950 Pacific Ave Ste 700 |
| | Tacoma, WA, 98402-4450 |
Counsel for Respondent/Cross-Appellant |
| | Mark Ronald Roberts |
| | Roberts Johns & Hemphill, PLLC |
| | 7525 Pioneer Way Ste 202 |
| | Gig Harbor, WA, 98335-1166 |
|
| | Michael Wayne Johns |
| | Roberts Johns & Hemphill, PLLC |
| | 7525 Pioneer Way Ste 202 |
| | Gig Harbor, WA, 98335-1166 |
|
| | Mark Bradley Tuvim |
| | Gordon & Rees LLP |
| | 701 5th Ave Ste 2100 |
| | Seattle, WA, 98104-7084 |
|
| | Kyle Rekofke |
| | Buchalter |
| | 1420 5th Ave Ste 3100 |
| | Seattle, WA, 98101-1337 |
View the Slip Opinion(s) Filed for this Case.
View a Printer Friendly Version of this Opinion Information Sheet.
|
