View the Slip Opinion(s) Filed for this Case.
Tip: Opinions open faster in Edge, Chrome, and FireFox once the FireFox PDF reader has been disabled.
View a Printer Friendly Version of this Opinion Information Sheet.
DO NOT CITE. SEE GR 14.1(a).
Court of Appeals Division I
State of Washington
Opinion Information Sheet
Docket Number: |
81445-1 |
Title of Case: |
Cascade Designs, Inc., Respondent/cr-appellant V. Robert Lerner, Appellant/cr-respondent |
File Date: |
11/29/2021 |
SOURCE OF APPEAL
----------------
Judgment or order under review |
Date filed: | 04/14/2020 |
Judge signing: | Honorable Regina Cahan |
JUDGES
------
Authored by | Lori Smith |
Concurring: | Bill Bowman |
| Linda Coburn |
COUNSEL OF RECORD
-----------------
Counsel for Appellant(s) |
| Michael P MateskyII |
| Matesky Law PLLC |
| 4500 9th Ave Ne Ste 300 |
| Seattle, WA, 98105-4762 |
|
| Philip Albert Talmadge |
| Talmadge/Fitzpatrick |
| 2775 Harbor Ave Sw |
| Third Floor Ste C |
| Seattle, WA, 98126-2138 |
Counsel for Respondent(s) |
| Carolyn Robbs Bilanko |
| Baker Hostetler LLP |
| 999 3rd Ave Ste 3900 |
| Seattle, WA, 98104-4076 |
|
| Douglas Anderson Grady |
| Baker & Hostetler LLP |
| 999 3rd Ave Ste 3900 |
| Seattle, WA, 98104-4076 |
Counsel for Appellant/Cross-Respondent |
| Michael P MateskyII |
| Matesky Law PLLC |
| 4500 9th Ave Ne Ste 300 |
| Seattle, WA, 98105-4762 |
|
| Philip Albert Talmadge |
| Talmadge/Fitzpatrick |
| 2775 Harbor Ave Sw |
| Third Floor Ste C |
| Seattle, WA, 98126-2138 |
Counsel for Respondent/Cross-Appellant |
| Douglas Anderson Grady |
| Baker & Hostetler LLP |
| 999 3rd Ave Ste 3900 |
| Seattle, WA, 98104-4076 |
|
| Carolyn Robbs Bilanko |
| Baker Hostetler LLP |
| 999 3rd Ave Ste 3900 |
| Seattle, WA, 98104-4076 |
Counsel for Appellant Intervenor(s) |
| Philip Albert Talmadge |
| Talmadge/Fitzpatrick |
| 2775 Harbor Ave Sw |
| Third Floor Ste C |
| Seattle, WA, 98126-2138 |
|
| Michael P MateskyII |
| Matesky Law PLLC |
| 4500 9th Ave Ne Ste 300 |
| Seattle, WA, 98105-4762 |
View the Slip Opinion(s) Filed for this Case.
View a Printer Friendly Version of this Opinion Information Sheet.
|