|
 View the Slip Opinion(s) Filed for this Case.
Tip: Opinions open faster in Edge, Chrome, and FireFox once the FireFox PDF reader has been disabled.
 View a Printer Friendly Version of this Opinion Information Sheet.
DO NOT CITE. SEE GR 14.1(a).
Court of Appeals Division I
State of Washington
Opinion Information Sheet
| Docket Number: |
82047-8 |
| Title of Case: |
Wright's Crossing, Llc, Et Al., Appellants V. Island County, Et Al., Respondents |
| File Date: |
04/12/2021 |
SOURCE OF APPEAL
----------------
| Appeal from Thurston Superior Court |
| Docket No: | 18-2-01703-1 |
| Judgment or order under review |
| Date filed: | 04/23/2019 |
| Judge signing: | Honorable Erik D Price |
JUDGES
------
| Authored by | John Chun |
| Concurring: | Linda Coburn |
| Bill Bowman |
COUNSEL OF RECORD
-----------------
Counsel for Appellant(s) |
| | William Theodore Lynn |
| | Attorney at Law |
| | 1201 Pacific Ave Ste 2100 |
| | Tacoma, WA, 98402-4314 |
|
| | Margaret Yvonne Archer |
| | Attorney at Law |
| | 1201 Pacific Ave Ste 2100 |
| | Tacoma, WA, 98402-4314 |
Counsel for Respondent(s) |
| | Barbara Dykes Ehrlichman |
| | Island County Prosecuting Attorney |
| | Po Box 5000 |
| | Coupeville, WA, 98239-5000 |
|
| | David A Jorgensen |
| | Island County Prosecuting Attorney |
| | Po Box 5000 |
| | Coupeville, WA, 98239-5000 |
|
| | Bryan James Telegin |
| | Attorney at Law |
| | 1424 4th Ave Ste 500 |
| | Seattle, WA, 98101-2258 |
|
| | Lisa M Petersen |
| | WA State Attorney General's Office (LAL) |
| | 800 5th Ave Ste 2000 |
| | Seattle, WA, 98104-3188 |
|
| | Licensing & Administrative Law Atty General |
| | Attorney at Law |
| | 800 Fifth Ave, Suite 2000 |
| | Ms-tb-14 |
| | Seattle, WA, 98104 |
Counsel for Other Parties |
| | Lisa M Petersen |
| | WA State Attorney General's Office (LAL) |
| | 800 5th Ave Ste 2000 |
| | Seattle, WA, 98104-3188 |
|
| | Licensing & Administrative Law Atty General |
| | Attorney at Law |
| | 800 Fifth Ave, Suite 2000 |
| | Ms-tb-14 |
| | Seattle, WA, 98104 |
View the Slip Opinion(s) Filed for this Case.
View a Printer Friendly Version of this Opinion Information Sheet.
|
