|
 View the Slip Opinion(s) Filed for this Case.
Tip: Opinions open faster in Edge, Chrome, and FireFox once the FireFox PDF reader has been disabled.
 View a Printer Friendly Version of this Opinion Information Sheet.
DO NOT CITE. SEE GR 14.1(a).
Court of Appeals Division I
State of Washington
Opinion Information Sheet
| Docket Number: |
82644-1 |
| Title of Case: |
Naixiang Lian, Appellant V. Arun Nagrajan And Indhu Krishna Sicaramakrishnan, Respondents |
| File Date: |
02/06/2023 |
SOURCE OF APPEAL
----------------
| Judgment or order under review |
| Date filed: | 04/12/2021 |
| Judge signing: | Honorable Catherine Shaffer |
JUDGES
------
| Authored by | David Mann |
| David Mann |
| Concurring: | Cecily Hazelrigg |
| Lori Smith |
| Cecily Hazelrigg |
| Lori Smith |
COUNSEL OF RECORD
-----------------
Counsel for Appellant(s) |
| | Gregg Aaron Myers |
| | The Appellate Law Firm |
| | 300 Lenora Street |
| | Ste. 900 |
| | Seattle, WA, 98121 |
|
| | Kyle Bryce Berti |
| | The Law Office of Kyle Berti, P.L.L.C. |
| | Po Box 11 |
| | Olalla, WA, 98359-0011 |
|
|
| | Gregg Aaron Myers |
| | The Appellate Law Firm |
| | 300 Lenora Street |
| | Ste. 900 |
| | Seattle, WA, 98121 |
|
| | Kyle Bryce Berti |
| | The Law Office of Kyle Berti, P.L.L.C. |
| | Po Box 11 |
| | Olalla, WA, 98359-0011 |
|
Counsel for Respondent(s) |
| | Levi Lewis BendeleIII |
| | Lee Smart PS Inc |
| | 701 Pike St Ste 1800 |
| | Seattle, WA, 98101-3929 |
|
| | Douglas Edward Wilson |
| | Law Office of Douglas E Wilson |
| | Po Box 15631 |
| | Seattle, WA, 98115-0631 |
|
| | Ashley Marie Langley |
| | Lee Smart, P.S., Inc. |
| | 701 Pike St Ste 1800 |
| | Seattle, WA, 98101-3929 |
|
| | Levi Lewis BendeleIII |
| | Lee Smart PS Inc |
| | 701 Pike St Ste 1800 |
| | Seattle, WA, 98101-3929 |
|
| | Douglas Edward Wilson |
| | Law Office of Douglas E Wilson |
| | Po Box 15631 |
| | Seattle, WA, 98115-0631 |
|
| | Ashley Marie Langley |
| | Lee Smart, P.S., Inc. |
| | 701 Pike St Ste 1800 |
| | Seattle, WA, 98101-3929 |
View the Slip Opinion(s) Filed for this Case.
View a Printer Friendly Version of this Opinion Information Sheet.
|
