Skip Page LinksWelcome to Washington State Courts
Courts Home> Caseloads of the Courts
 

Caseloads of the Courts of Washington

Supreme Court
History of Pending Cases (1) - 2008 to 2012

2008 2009 % Chg (4) 2010 % Chg (4) 2011 % Chg (4) 2012 % Chg (4)
TRIAL COURTS
Criminal Appeals  . %  . %  . %  . % 
Civil Appeals  36  28  . %  35  . %  32  -8.6 %  38  18.8 % 
Total Appeals  43  33  -23.3 %  41  24.2 %  38  -7.3 %  42  10.5 % 
Direct Discretionary Review  10  . %  . %  14  . %  16  . % 
Death Penalty Review  . %  . %  . %  . % 
Expenditure of Public Funds  13  . %  11  . %  11  . %  . % 
TOTAL--TRIAL COURTS  67  46  -31.3 %  60  30.4 %  65  8.3 %  69  6.2 % 
COURT OF APPEALS
Criminal  293  288  -1.7 %  222  -22.9 %  220  -0.9 %  209  -5 % 
Civil  207  187  -9.7 %  132  -29.4 %  137  3.8 %  125  -8.8 % 
Total Petition for Review  500  475  -5 %  354  -25.5 %  357  0.8 %  334  -6.4 % 
Motion for Discr. Review  27  30  . %  33  . %  24  . %  24  . % 
Motion for Discr. Rvw of PRP (2)  119  133  11.8 %  154  15.8 %  103  -33.1 %  124  20.4 % 
Notice of Appeal  20  15  . %  . %  . %  10  . % 
TOTAL--COURT OF APPEALS  666  653  -2 %  550  -15.8 %  492  -10.5 %  492  0 % 
ORIGINAL ACTIONS AND
CERTIFIED FROM FEDERAL COURT
TOTAL--ORIG. ACTIONS & FED COURT  95  78  -17.9 %  98  25.6 %  109  11.2 %  74  -32.1 % 
WSBA/CJC
TOTAL--WSBA/CJC (3)  N/A  N/A  . %  N/A  . %  N/A  . %  N/A  . % 
TOTAL PENDING  828  777  -6.2 %  708  -8.9 %  666  -5.9 %  635  -4.7 % 

(1) Implementation of the new Appellate Court Records and Data System (ACORDS-II) in the Supreme Court on 6/09/2003 has enabled improved reporting categories and inclusion of review types that were not published in previous annual reports (death penalty reviews, attorney admission and discipline matters, and miscellaneous motions for review). Figures for all years have been recomputed accordingly for presentation in the 2003 and future publications.
(2) Improved coding in late 2000 now allows distinct reporting of 1) Motions for Discretionary Review and 2) Motions for Discretionary Review of PRP. Prior to 2001, both are included in Motions for Discretionary Review.
(3) Prior to 2003, resolution, pending and mandate information was not reported for cases from the Washington State Bar Association and the Commission on Judicial Conduct. Recording of this information began for resolutions occurring in 2003 and beyond, but is not available retroactively. As a consequence: 1) pending information is not available for WSBA and CJC cases, and 2) resolution and mandate information is available only for 2003 and beyond. In addition, resolution information for years 2004 forward includes some old cases for which the disposed status has been retroactively determined and recorded.
(4) Percentages are not reported when numbers are small (less than 30).

 
 
Courts | Organizations | News | Opinions | Rules | Forms | Directory | Library 
Back to Top | Privacy and Disclaimer Notices